School Choice

During the past week I was repeatedly struck by information that confirmed that KPBSD is a district of choice. On Friday afternoon I attended the Connections parent training that included a panel of our homeschool parents and an audience of the same with remarkably well behaved children. The panel fielded questions from the moderator and the audience on strategies used to offer their children a successful homeschool experience. After about an hour of listening to the conversation I was convinced that these parents’ decision to keep their children home for school is well supported by our Connections staff.  The misconception by some, that Connections parents are on their own, often straying from the core, was dispelled by what I heard. A second item occurred earlier in the week when our school board agreed to charge rent to our charter schools that use district facilities. This move brought new attention to our charters and further establishes these four schools as belonging to the district. The third and fourth items were learning that our distance delivery teachers located at Soldotna Prep are offering more than 800 units of class and that we now have 168 students taking courses from Kenai Peninsula College. When you step back and consider all this, and let’s not forget our alternative schools and River City Academy, it is clear that the district offers our families a lot more options than just attending the neighborhood school.

Twenty years ago, our neighborhood schools were the district’s only offering for our students. While these schools were and are our foundation, and will for the foreseeable future, educate the vast  majority of our students, it is exciting to know that how and where we educate our children is changing. As we strive to find the right number of options to meet our students’ needs, let’s ensure that we are receptive to including the input of our stakeholders and our students’ prospective employers. The need to consider this input and then create opportunities for innovation as a way to counter the inertia of the greater institution of public education is critical. I am convinced that school choice when done well, promotes a district culture of innovation that will ultimately lead to a better learning opportunities for our students.

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | Leave a comment

Safety Drills

The start of school each August is always a furious time with much of the first few weeks devoted to learning routines and how (for the younger students) to behave in a group setting. It is also a time to ensure that procedures followed in the event of an emergency are reviewed and soundly in place. On Friday I was at Sterling Elementary to watch their bus evacuation drill. The simulated event with the students exiting out the buses’ rear doors went well, with the older students helping the younger ones to the pavement. Last week district administrators spent time reviewing how we will revise our response to an intruder in one of our buildings. Fire drills, as they have for years, occur once each month and the ever watchful eye of our staff for anything that can harm a child is always there. In sum, we embrace the trust that parents place in our staff to keep their children safe.

Fortunately, the vast majority of time at school is devoted to academic studies. From the primary student learning to read to the senior finding the derivative of a function, our students take small academic steps on each of the 170 days of a school year. These steps are measured and are usually the indicators used to rate the effectiveness of a school. Although few recognize it, the trainings and preparation that we take for an emergency are also an indicator of quality. Doing this side of things poorly, would immediately diminish a school’s value. While we are fortunate that the likelihood of an emergency is extremely low, let’s take a moment to thank our staff for the good job that they do preparing in the event that things do go wrong.

 

 

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | Leave a comment

Strengths of our schools

On Thursday I traveled to Hope School and had the good fortune to catch the tail end of their open house. After the last parents and students were gone, I spent about an hour visiting with the staff and learned that things are going well. They were excited about the start of the year and boasted about the effective way that they  divvied up the various assignments at this 23 student school. One of the teachers does all the math and science while the other does the language arts and humanities. Some of the students are also benefitting from one of the community members teaching welding. As I drove away I had to marvel that this small, sleepy community at the end of the road has a thriving school. It was just a few years ago that the enrollment had fallen under the required 10 students.

KPBSD is Alaska’s most diverse district with schools that range from one teacher at Moose Pass to traditional schools such as Mountain View Elementary with it 440 students. Occasionally, I hear grumblings about the inequity of our schools because some offer more opportunities than others. After listening to the Hope staff describe their school, I am not so sure that this is true. Sure the kids at Hope do not have a music teacher and sure their high school students do not have as many electives. Overall however, I am convinced that the experience at Hope, while different, is just as effective as what happens at our larger schools. The Hope students have a low stress social environment with lots of community support and a staff who does what it takes. The individual attention that the students receive prevents them from falling through the cracks. Each of our 43 schools has dedicated staff and community members who support their school. Let’s not lose sight of the individual strengths and appeal of our schools. There is not just one way to educate kids on the Kenai.

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | Leave a comment

Defining success

Last week I jumped on the media fed bandwagon and cheered for Mo’ne Davis. The 13-year old little league baseball player from Philadelphia captured the country’s attention because she is a girl succeeding in a boy dominated sport. It was great to see her inspire so many and to do so with such poise. Although I recognize that much of Mo’ne’s appeal was that it was an emotional feel-good news item, I also recognize that as educators and parents, we all want our students and children to be poised and successful. Because only a few like Mo’ne can rise to the top, it is important that we ensure that an elite level of success is not the defining measure for our students.

There is a fair amount of debate and lamenting about how, compared to the old days, we are too soft on children. There are some who feel it is a mistake to hand out too many trophies at competitive events and that doing so gives children a false sense of success. Building a child’s self-esteem however, is a responsibility that we should all take seriously. This has to include acknowledgement of doing well and more importantly, recognition of improvement or trying hard. Kids like Mo’ne are gifted but have also devoted a lot of time and energy to becoming so good. Let’s ensure that we establish a culture of improvement for our students that includes encouragement to persevere when things do not go well and an understanding that although society will always fixate on the elite, one’s own improvements and successes are just as important.

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | Leave a comment

Constant change

Last week’s 50 year celebration of KPB, KPC and KPBSD was a great chance to reflect back on the district’s past, and to look forward to what will be. My review of our early days uncovered dozens of neat tidbits of a district in its infancy and a borough with much less infrastructure than it has today. It also showed that change is a constant- the district has been in a constant state of improvement for fifty years. Now that the ceremony is over, my take-away is that while it is easy to simply state that change will happen, it is critical that we are more and more analytical and then selective with what we pursue as a way to improve. In sum, it’s best to spend some time looking beneath the shiny wrapper before completing the purchase order.

Each morning I get dozens of emails from vendors promoting a program or product that will help our students find academic success. Although I appreciate that the programs are well done, I approach them with skepticism knowing that an overdependence on outside entities is not a long term solution to how to get better. I am convinced that we have the internal capacity to improve and that by making small changes to what we do, we can take the needed strides forward. Certainly, there are times when we need to buy materials and we do benefit from programs such as Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports, but I feel it is wrong to look too far beyond our borders when so many talented people on the inside are working together to make the needed changes. For after all, who knows better what we need?

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | Leave a comment

Supporting our students in need

Each morning I scan the headlines of the world news but rarely have time to read the stories.  This morning I had a chance to learn more about the horrors in the Middle East, Ukraine and Africa and came away thinking that in recent memory, this summer has to be its most depressing stretch of time for world affairs.  I am thankful that we live in such a relatively peaceful place where folks are free to focus on oil taxes and how to better manage our salmon.  And while our distance from the horrors of the world does allow this peace, we should not be blind to what is going on in our neighborhood.

In ten days all of our schools will again be open.  For some of our students this is an annoying end to the freedom of summer. For others however, the resumption of school and the accompanying structure and support is a welcome change.  Each of our schools has students experiencing  poverty and its associated stresses who will be happy to back  at school.  This stress is of course not on the scale of that which children in Iraqi Kurdistan are experiencing, but it is very real.  The limitations of poverty on learning is well documented and I am convinced how to respond is one of our most pressing challenges.  I occasionally hear that schools shouldn’t be offering free breakfast and lunch and that there shouldn’t be social supports for students at school. While I understand the frustration that people feel toward adults on the dole, I don’t feel that we can ever lump children into the same conversation. Let’s give thanks to our staff who buy students winter clothing and school supplies and more importantly, offer these children a chance to be free of some of the stress that accompanies their plight. For many of our community, the end of summer is a time to think about moose and firewood.  Let’s be thankful that we can do this, but let’s also not lose sight of the need to support our students in need who are headed back to school.

 

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | Leave a comment

Learning Character

I am working on my opening presentation to the staff that is a state of the district type of address. I will share various data and then explore and encourage ways for us to improve. While our overall strong performance should make us feel good, we do have some students who are not having the academic success that we expect. When looking for reasons for why this is the case, I can identify things such as gender difference- our girls outperform our boys- and also point to poverty as a significant factor for why some of our poor students do not do well. What I keep bumping into in education research however, is that while gender and poverty are good predictors of school performance, the character of a students is just as important. It is found that those students who have learned the character traits to be resilient, conscientious and prudent will overcome other limitations and do well at school.

Researchers find that teachers can improve student character by promoting the listed traits though delayed gratification, rewarding hard work and insisting that students stick to something when the going gets tough. This can be accomplished by helping children practice self-control, providing a reason or goal to stay disciplined, for example, doing homework after practice, and by others in the school modeling these traits. Many of our schools have Character Counts and Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports programs to promote good character. My sense is these programs are working but are not enough to help our students become resilient, conscientious and prudent.  These traits must also be taught and modeled by our teachers and administrators in a more personal and less formal way.

 

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | Leave a comment

Grant to increase digital learning

This week’s announcement that KPBSD is one of four districts to receive state grant money for digital learning is good news.  We worked hard on the grant application and are pleased that the award will allow us to grow our digital infrastructure and train our teachers in how to better use this medium of instruction.  The delivery of digital content by a teacher at one KPBSD school to a student(s) at another has been happening for years.  The increased level of support provided by the grant will bolster this existing practice.  This expansion of how we educate our students is particularly appealing at our smaller schools that struggle to offer the full array of courses available at our larger schools.   With this in mind, it is important that we are ever more critical of the quality of digital content so that we avoid falling into the trap of assuming that all such courses are equally good.

As a way to vet our digital content, we joined the Quality Matters Program.  Quality Matters was formed by a group of universities over six years ago using US Dept. of Education and IES funding to establish best practices and design standards for online courses.  This quality assurance not only helps us to evaluate our course offerings, but also leads to professional development to help teachers improve their instruction.  As the pendulum of instruction shifts more to the digital side, it is important that we embrace the changes with eyes wide open.  The grant monies will help us do this.

 

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | Leave a comment

Pressure to improve

At the end of each school year our principals produce two annual reports.  One is to highlight all the good things that happened at their school and the other is to summarize their site council activity for this period. Without dwelling on the specifics of what is in the reports, I want to note that an incredible number of positives took place during the just completed school year. It is clear that staff and their respective site councils are committed to making their schools a better place for their students. These annual reports however, not only celebrate what took place, but draw attention to the ongoing pressure felt by our schools to continue their improvement journey, a journey that of course never ends.

At the national level this pressure is being felt and in response, there is a move to put on hold (for a year) the formal tests that will assess the Common Core.  The move to do so is based on recognition that the teachers have not had enough time to prepare their students for these tests.  Here in Alaska, our students will begin taking the state’s new tests of Alaska’s standards late next winter.  I know that many would also like to delay things by a year.  While the results of these tests will likely be lower than what we are used to, they should not diminish the light on all the positives that occur at our schools.  The two mentioned reports are a part of the July Board Packet- I encourage you to pick through them to gain a sense of what is going on across the district.

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | 1 Comment

Teen social tension

I took time yesterday to drive to Homer to see Project Grad’s Summer College Institute’s closing ceremony.  This culminating event showcased the institute’s activities by having the students take turns sharing their work.  The presentations ranging from a Lego robot walking a dog to poetry on threatened species, not only provided a glimpse into what the students did for two weeks, but also gave them a chance to shine in front of their parents and peers.  The exuberance of the students and the obvious strong bond that they had with the staff and one another quickly led me to conclude that the institute was a success.  I was most impressed by the confidence of the students and by their casual and respectful relationship with each other and with the staff. I don’t always see this when I observe groups of our teenage students. I often see a social tension that bottles up some of the adolescent energy that I saw yesterday. On the drive home I thought about why this is so.

Certainly the short response to why this is the case is that a summer camp bears little resemblance to school, that it is not fair to compare two weeks of field trips and cool activities to regular school. And while this is valid, it suggests that perhaps we do not spend enough time thinking about what an optimum learning environment for our students looks like.  Clearly, the Project Grad kids thrived in their learning environment. It is also appropriate to point to barriers such as the myriad of regulations and the shallow definition of school attendance as reasons for what may inhibit the environment that affects students’ learning.  But, I am not convinced that the lack of the more typical school routines is what caused the Project Grad students to be so confident, secure and apparently distant from the social tension that can overwhelm teenagers.  My take is that the relatively small number of students and the ten or so adults allowed for relationship building among the group that does not always happen at school.  I think another reason for this is the students interacting with the adults in a multiple settings and not just in math class.  As we examine how to ensure that all our students are gaining the most that they can from school, it may make sense to review how we structure our high schools with more effort spent creating interdisciplinary opportunities for cohorts of students and not just setting schedules for the school at large.  Some high schools separate their students into houses to promote better relationships among the students and the staff assigned to that house.   The teenage years can be hard for students as they strive to be comfortable with who they are and not overwhelmed by what the peer group expects them to be.  We all need to be sensitive to this need by creating an environment that is welcoming.  This can only be achieved if we can maintain a relatively personal school experience.

Post to Twitter

Posted in Schools and Assessment | Leave a comment